Yes No Share to Facebook
Uttering Threats Defence Strategy:
Includes Showing That an Innocent Person May Be Accused
Last Updated: August 22 2026
Question: How can a lawyer help defend me if I’m accused of uttering threats in Ontario?
Answer: A strong uttering threats defence in Ontario depends on the Crown proving every essential element beyond a reasonable doubt, including identity, meaning they must prove the alleged threat was uttered by you, not just that a threatening statement was made. If the evidence is unclear, inconsistent, or fails to connect you to the words or the circumstances, an experienced lawyer can challenge identification, scrutinize witness and disclosure issues, and help negotiate or contest the charge in court, including through LSO tribunal representation where relevant. Lo Greco Law provides 30+ year experienced lawyer services for people across Ontario, with practical guidance aimed at reducing risk and protecting your rights. Call (416) 488-4110 for a free 1/4-hour consultation to discuss your situation and next steps.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
What Helps to Defend An Person Accused of Making Threats?
In the Prosecution of a Person Accused of Uttering Threats, Identity Is An Element That Must Be Proven Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Without Proof of Identity of the Person Who Allegedly Uttered a Threat, An Acquittal of the Charges Should Result.
Note: Please contact Lo Greco Law by phone at: (416) 488-4110 to discuss any specific questions that you may have.
Uttering Threats Defence Strategy:
An Innocent Person May Be Accused
Facing accusations of uttering threats can be a daunting experience. For an accused person, it is crucial to understand the various elements that must be proven for a case to result in a conviction. Failure by the Prosecutor to prove these elements, beyond a reasonable doubt, typically results in an acquittal. These legal nuances and the importance of accurate evidence play a critical role within the fairness of the justice system.
Among the key general issues often encountered in the defence of a person accused of uttering threats is the requirement that the Prosecutor must prove the element of identity; and accordingly, the Prosecutor must firmly demonstrate that the alleged threat was uttered by the accused person. Without clear evidence, this element is unproven.
Conclusion
A Prosecutor, during the prosecution of an uttering threats charge, must prove that a threat was uttered and that the threat was uttered by the accused person.
